Aurora DSQL: The Lambda Moment for Databases That’s Still Coming

At re:Invent 2024, AWS announced Aurora DSQL (Distributed SQL), and while it didn’t generate the same immediate buzz as Lambda did in 2014, I believe we’ll look back on this announcement as equally transformative for how we build cloud applications. However, unlike Lambda’s relatively quick adoption curve, DSQL faces a longer road to widespread production use. Here’s why.

What Makes Aurora DSQL Revolutionary

Aurora DSQL represents a fundamental rethinking of relational database architecture. Similar to how DynamoDB separated storage from compute and abstracted away the underlying infrastructure, DSQL does the same for SQL databases:

True storage/compute separation: Unlike traditional Aurora, which still ties compute to storage in meaningful ways, DSQL completely decouples these layers
Multi-region active-active by default: This is perhaps the most groundbreaking feature—write to any region, read from any region, with automatic conflict resolution
Abstracted networking: No more VPC configuration, security groups, or subnet management for your database
Serverless by design: Automatic scaling without the limitations of Aurora Serverless v2
Simplified operations: No more patching, maintenance windows, or version upgrades to manage

The architectural similarities to DynamoDB are striking, but with the familiarity and power of SQL. This is what makes it so promising—it combines the operational benefits of NoSQL with the query capabilities and ecosystem of PostgreSQL.

Why It’s Not Ready for Production (Yet)

Despite its promise, there are several reasons why most organizations shouldn’t rush to migrate production workloads to DSQL:

1. PostgreSQL Compatibility Gaps

While DSQL is PostgreSQL-compatible, it’s not fully PostgreSQL-compatible. Notable missing features include:

Foreign key constraints
Certain extensions like pgvector (crucial for AI/ML workloads)
Some advanced PostgreSQL functions and operators
Certain transaction isolation levels

For applications heavily dependent on these features, migration is currently impossible without significant rearchitecting.

2. Ecosystem Immaturity

The tooling and ecosystem around DSQL are still developing:

Limited monitoring and observability solutions
Fewer third-party tools with explicit DSQL support
Less community knowledge and troubleshooting resources
Evolving best practices for multi-region data modeling

3. Data Migration Complexity

Unlike compute, which can be relatively easily swapped (e.g., EC2 to Lambda), database migrations are inherently more complex:

Data consistency must be maintained during migration
Schema changes may be required to accommodate DSQL’s limitations
Application code often has deep coupling to database specifics
Testing database migrations thoroughly is challenging

This complexity means that even if DSQL were feature-complete today, adoption would still be slower than what we saw with Lambda.

The Path to Production Readiness

For DSQL to achieve its potential as the “Lambda of databases,” several things need to happen:

Full PostgreSQL compatibility: Support for foreign keys, all common extensions, and complete SQL feature parity
Mature migration paths: Better tools and patterns for migrating from traditional databases
Ecosystem development: More third-party tools, monitoring solutions, and community knowledge
Reference architectures: Well-documented patterns for common use cases
Production success stories: Early adopters proving the technology in real-world scenarios

I expect this to take 2-3 years, similar to how Lambda took time to mature from its initial release to becoming the production standard it is today.

Who Should Consider DSQL Today?

Despite its current limitations, certain types of projects might benefit from DSQL even now:

New projects with simple data models that don’t require advanced PostgreSQL features
Global applications where multi-region active-active is a critical requirement
Development and testing environments where you can gain experience with the technology
Non-critical microservices that can be isolated from your core database

The Future Impact

When I look at what DSQL represents architecturally, I’m convinced that we’ll eventually view re:Invent 2024 as a pivotal moment in database evolution. Just as Lambda fundamentally changed how we think about compute, DSQL will change how we think about data persistence.

The ability to have a fully managed, globally distributed SQL database with no infrastructure to maintain represents the fulfillment of the cloud promise for databases. It removes the final major operational burden that most teams still carry.

Once DSQL becomes more compatible with the full PostgreSQL feature set and ecosystem, I predict we’ll see new projects increasingly start with DSQL by default, just as many now start with Lambda rather than EC2.

Conclusion

Aurora DSQL represents a glimpse into the future of database architecture. While it’s not yet ready for most production workloads, its architectural approach is sound and likely to become the standard for how we build and deploy databases in the cloud.

For now, I recommend keeping a close eye on DSQL’s development, experimenting with it for suitable use cases, and preparing your team for the eventual shift in database architecture that it represents. The “Lambda moment” for databases is coming—it’s just going to take a bit longer to fully arrive.

Found this insightful? If you're interested in my AWS consulting, please reach out to me via email or on X

Aurora DSQL: The Future of Database Architecture